Wednesday, December 23, 2009
What about America Mr. Carter?
I read an article today that Jimmy ( never met a terrorist he didn't love Carter ) has apologized to the Jews. As his grandson is about to run for public office in a district with a substantial Jewish population I have to wonder about the sincerity of said apology. What I want to know is where is his apology to America? He needs to apologize for the shambles he made of our economy and our military during his hellish term as President. He also needs to apologize for his treason inn that he gives comfort and support for our enemies. Namely Hezbollah and Hamas. This man is a coward and traitor and he owes an apology to the American people. I am ashamed he once was my commander-in chief. Now in the White House we have Carter 2, the Obama regime. I pray we survive this mistake. I can only hope there is a Ronald Reagan waiting in the wings.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Crazier and Crazier
The world just keeps going to hell in a handbasket. Obama and the Dems are succeeding in saddling future generations with debt. Government is growing larger and larger. Now young people have to serve as the government sees fit to qualify for education money, illegal immigration is about to be made legal if Pelosi gets her way. Ahhh you have to love socialism. The world gets crazier and crazier.
A woman was arrested in the murder and rape by a foreign objecy of little Sandra Cantu. We need to stop trampling on the alleged murderer's civil rights and give her a speedy, fair trial, fold her into a 95% waterproof trunk, and sink her in a pond or lake. Also arrested recently is a medical student charged with being the craigslist killer. Try him, and light him up. But these two have rights they didn't give their victims. Even if found guilty appeals will go on for years. Crazier and crazier.
Miss California is being villified for her deeply held religious belief that marriage should be between a man and woman. Perez Hilton ( the sickingly gay blogger ) called her an empty headed b_ _ _ _ who only had half a brain. Of course Hollywood agreed with him, even lil ole Miley Cyrus. Billy, you need to whip that young ladies butt, and then someone needs to whip yours. Well Miss California you just keep on being who you are. God knows, California could use the light.
A woman was arrested in the murder and rape by a foreign objecy of little Sandra Cantu. We need to stop trampling on the alleged murderer's civil rights and give her a speedy, fair trial, fold her into a 95% waterproof trunk, and sink her in a pond or lake. Also arrested recently is a medical student charged with being the craigslist killer. Try him, and light him up. But these two have rights they didn't give their victims. Even if found guilty appeals will go on for years. Crazier and crazier.
Miss California is being villified for her deeply held religious belief that marriage should be between a man and woman. Perez Hilton ( the sickingly gay blogger ) called her an empty headed b_ _ _ _ who only had half a brain. Of course Hollywood agreed with him, even lil ole Miley Cyrus. Billy, you need to whip that young ladies butt, and then someone needs to whip yours. Well Miss California you just keep on being who you are. God knows, California could use the light.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
I Finally Made It
At first, according to the Obamessiah I was just a bitter man who was clinging to my guns and my religion. Now according to the new Socialist administration I am a right wing extremist/ terrorist. Not only the above but I met more than one criteria. First I am a bible believing Christian who thinks abortion is wrong. Secondly, I believe the constitution means what it says. I have the right to have guns, and I also have the right to criticize the government. See, the constitution says the government works for me and for you. The constitution also says in essence that we shouldn't fear the government. In fact, the government should fear the people. We have the constitutional right to fire them, but the sheeple have grown complacent and lazy. Let's let the government take care of us. Who cares if our children and grandchildren are mired in our debt? We should all care. America is in trouble. Serious trouble, so start getting ready now. Liberal, socialist senator Chuck (lets tax that) Schumer actually said people don't care about values anymore. I care Chuckie. I believe we will soon see how many people care. After all we finally made it.
Friday, April 3, 2009
Rapid Change
I have to apologize to my loyal reader for being away so long. lol. Things are really moving at an accelerated rate. Socialism is steadily becoming our style of government. The government now fires people from private business. Oh, and now instead of GM standing for General Motors it stands for Government Motors. Patriots, things are beginning to shape up. Battle lines are being drawn. Tea parties are springing up across the country, people are beginning to awaken. I pray they are at any rate. In Hardeman county Tennessee, which is near here, there is a joint exercise this weekend with local police and troops doing stops at checkpoints. It seems to me this is a direct violation of Posse Comitatus. recently a similar thing was planned in Iowa but was cancelled due to public outcry. I think these things are being attempted in an effort to get sheeple used to seeing troops carrying out civilian law enforcement duties so when it counts there is little opposition. I think I will check my inventory. May God help America.
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Paying The Bully
Premier Obama sent a letter to the Russians offering to stop missile defense plans in Europe if they would persuade Iran to give up it's nuclear program. That's like paying the bully not to beat you up on the playground. This president is weak, he is making America seem weak. If we appear weak, we are then vulnerable. I don't know if this president will kill this country from within, or if he will weaken us to the point of being ruled by foreigners some day. Paying the bully is no way to run foreign policy. So come on Obama, grow a set.
Friday, February 27, 2009
Tearing Down The Republic
Tea parties have sprung up across America to show how unhappy people are getting about the unprecedented spending, and the steady march toward socialism perpetrated by the new administration. I saw a picture of one of the Tea Parties in Houston and a lady was holding a sign that read "220 years to build the repulic and 1 month to tear it down". These Tea Parties are of course a take on the famous Boston Tea Party. People are fed up. I have to tell you folks, we "ain't seen nothing yet". The liberals (read socialists) have the power and are not about to give it up without a fight. You can look out for more taxes, more spending, and more trampling on the constitution. Look out Patriots!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Barbara and The U.N.
Barbara Boxer who is nothing more than a Senate Clone of Nancy "Ahmed" Pelosi is pushing Obamassiah and her colleagues in the Senate to ratify a treaty recognizing the rights of children. On the surface this may sound like a great thing. We all want to protect children. This treaty however, goes much farther than mere protection. It could take away a parents right to take their child to church, the right to discipline their child, and the right to homeschool. In reality it is a threat to the very sovereignity of our country. It is another nudge toward a one world government. I will post a link to the story on Fox News. Time to wake up Patriots.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/25/boxer-seeks-ratify-treaty-erode-rights/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/25/boxer-seeks-ratify-treaty-erode-rights/
Sunday, February 15, 2009
We need a hero!!
Followers of the great pedophile, err ummm, prophet Mohammed have kidnapped another American. On Friday, the kidnappers of American U.N. official John Solecki threatened to kill him within 72 hours and issued a 20-second video of the blindfolded captive saying he was "sick and in trouble." It is time to take off the kid gloves and remind everyone of who we truly are. I am so sick and tired of America and the rest of the world kowtowing to a bunch of oil rich, pedophile, following camel jockeys. Premier Obama, it is time to unleash hell in Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Let's go ahead and hook as many of them as possible up with their 72 virgins. Alas, that won't happen. We, like the rest of the world have fallen short of testicular fortitude. We aren't America anymore. We are a nation of sheeple. We have become weak willed and passive. Where are our great leaders? Our Ronald Reagans have all gone home. Our heroes have retired. Where are you Patriots?
Saturday, February 14, 2009
It's Official. U.S.A. now U.S.S.A.
As part of the spendulous bill, executives of banks that receive money from Comrade Obama and team cannot make more than $500,000.00 a year. I know these guys make to much money, but it is not governments place to tell companies how much they can make. If that's ok let's work on professional sports next. Socialism? Marxism? Oh and the funny part is this. This provision was stuck in there by Senator Chris Dodd. It was he and Barney Franks who played the biggest role in the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac fiasco. Watch them take more and more control every week. One good thing though. Nancy Pelosi made sure the Salt Marsh Mouse receives 30 million of the bailout to help it's endangered status. Now I can rest easier. It may kill the America we Patriots love, but the Salt Marsh Mouse will survive.
Why Bother?
I have been arguing with my coworkers today about the spendulous bill. They are all flaming liberals who seem to welcome the way Comrades Obama, Pelosi, and Reid are solving the economic crises by damning our children and grandchildren to paying off this unprecedented debt we are taking on with this bill. They have no problem with seeing our rights taken away one socialist move at a time. Even as I am typing, they are welcoming government inteference in healthcare. The name for these folks is sheeple. They are people, but like sheep they just blindly follow. Patriots, the government is supposed to work for us, not us for them. The government should fear the populace, not the other way around. Patriots, we are America!
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Invasion
I am going to post a link to a story in the Washington Times. This article is about a rancher being sued by some illegals he apprehended and held for the Border Patrol. He is being sued for 32 million dollars because he protected his home and land. Illegal immigration is an invasion. How does one stop an invasion? Meet said invasion with superior firepower and stategy. Here is the link. http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/09/16-illegals-sue-arizona-rancher/
Monday, February 9, 2009
Tightening Control
Not only is King Obama moving ahead with his plan to bankrupt America, he has also made a move to consolidate long term socialist control for the Socialist party ( formerly the Democratic Party ). He has put the census under control of the Whitehouse instead of the commerce department. Now King Obama and his evil minions can control the count of Americans and their geographic locations, thus increasing the count of representatives from Socialist states such as Vermont and New York, and reducing representation from conservative states such as Tennessee. How? They will cheat and lie, just like they always do. It is getting worse every day. King Obama is moving much faster than people thought he would to change the United States of America into the United Socialist States of America. Buy ammo in bulk America. If you are a patriot they will coming for you someday. Click on the link below to see where they will put us.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-legislation-authorizes-fema-camps-in-us.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-legislation-authorizes-fema-camps-in-us.html
Friday, February 6, 2009
Presidential Manure
Well the Obamassiah had charges dropped against the mastermind of the USS Cole bombing which took the lives of 17 brave sailors and injured 39 more in 2000. Obama met with families of those injured and killed, and I am sure he shovelled a huge pile of Presidential bullshit. This is the man that is supposed to keep us safe. He is a young, black Jimmy Carter. America is in trouble and it is time to prepare for the worst. Obama is going to do all he can to appease Islamic whackjobs thus leaving all of us vulnerable to attack. Patriots get up on that wall and be ever watchful. Our safety and our God given rights are in imminent danger. I never thought I would see America in this state. History demonstrates every great society which became steeped in debauchery, such as accepting homosexuality as normal has fallenl. Looks like we may be next.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
More Socialism
Premier Obama has put a cap on how much money the executives of a company can make. I agree these guys make an obscene amount of money, but to intefere in this way is pure socialism. If this is overlooked, and allowed, soon we will be subjects instead of citizens. Wake up America. The Constitution is being trampled one right at a time. Wake up! Where are the patriots today? Save America!
Sunday, February 1, 2009
The Problem With America is Stupidity
"The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself" I can't remember where or when I came across this quote but I like it a lot. If you listen to the news you come across loads and loads of stupidity. The latest example is of course the stimulus package presented by the liberal messiah, Obama. This whole package is designed to increase government and the American peoples dependence on said government. in other words the liberals seek to enslave us. That's right enslave us. I do not want to be beholden to the government. I don't want my children or their children to have to pay off this huge government debt that is accruing. The more money we print the more worthless it is. People wake up! Choose freedom, contact legislators and let them know we don't want to be enslaved to their liberal anti-American ideals. Be a patriot.
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Interesting read
A Very Real New World Order
by Chuck Baldwin Constitution Party 2008 Presidential Candidate
It is hard to believe, but a majority of Americans (including Christians and conservatives) seem oblivious to the fact that there is a very real, very legitimate New World Order (NWO) unfolding. In the face of overwhelming evidence, most Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality, they seem unwilling to even remotely entertain the notion.
On one hand, it is understandable that so many Americans would be ignorant of the emerging New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses to report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even "conservative" commentators and talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, or Joe Scarborough refuse to discuss it. And when listeners call these respective programs, these "conservative" hosts usually resort to insulting the caller as being some kind of "conspiracy kook." One host even railed that if anyone questions the government line on 9/11, we should "lock them up and throw away the key." So much for freedom of speech!
This is an area--perhaps the central area--where liberals and conservatives agree: they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who believes that global government (in any form) is evolving. One has to wonder how otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people can be so brain dead when it comes to this issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling their strings, doesn’t it?
The list of notable personalities who have openly referenced or called for some kind of global government or New World Order is extremely lengthy. Are all these people "kooks" or "conspiracy nuts"? Why would world leaders--including presidents, secretaries of state, and high government officials; including the media, financial, and political elite--constantly refer to something that doesn’t exist? Why would they write about, talk about, or openly promote a New World Order, if there is no such thing?
Many of us recall President George Herbert Walker Bush talking much about an emerging New World Order. For example, in 1989, Bush told the students of Texas A&M University, "Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations."
Later, Bush, Sr. said, "We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order . . .. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders."
Bush, Sr. also said, "What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea--a new world order."
Bush, Sr. further said, "The world can therefore seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order . . ."
What was President G.H.W. Bush talking about, if there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he hallucinating?
England’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said, "We are all internationalists now, whether we like it or not." He continued saying, "On the eve of a new Millennium we are now in a new world. We need new rules for international co-operation and new ways of organizing our international institutions." He also said, "Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community."
In 1999, Tony Blair said, "Globalization has transformed our economies and our working practices. But globalism is not just economic. It is also a political and security phenomenon."
What is Tony Blair talking about, if there is no emerging New World Order? What does he mean by "a new doctrine of international community"? What does he mean by "new world"? How can one have globalism, which includes "a political and security phenomenon," without creating a New World Order? Is Tony Blair hallucinating?
Likewise, former President George W. Bush penned his signature to the Declaration of Quebec back on April 22, 2001, in which he gave a "commitment to hemispheric integration and national and collective responsibility for improving the economic well-being and security of our people."
By "our people," Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the people of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly reminded us that G.W. Bush "pledged that the United States will ’build a hemispheric family on the basis of a more just and democratic international order.’"
Remember, too, that it was G.W. Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United States to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is nothing more than a precursor to the North American Community or Union, as outlined in CFR member Robert Pastor’s manual, "Toward a North American Community."
If there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order, what was G.W. Bush talking about when he referred to "a hemispheric family" and an "international order"?
The public statements of notable world leaders regarding an emerging New World Order are copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman, Walter Cronkite.
In his book, "A Reporter’s Life," Walter Cronkite said, "A system of world order--preferably a system of world government--is mandatory. The proud nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and their own survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . ." Cronkite told BBC newsman Tim Sebastian, "I think we are realizing that we are going to have to have an international rule of law." He added, "We need not only an executive to make international law, but we need the military forces to enforce that law." Cronkite also said, "American people are going to begin to realize that perhaps they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an international body to enforce world law."
If there is no emerging New World Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking about? Can there be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global government? Absolutely not!
Now, when Bush, Sr. talks about fulfilling "the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders," he was talking about the same thing former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he said, "The time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed."
The United Nations has been on the forefront of promoting the New World Order agenda since its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual entitled, "Our Global Neighborhood." It states, "Population, consumption, technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management calls for a systematic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development, which has been the central lesson from the mounting ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global governance."
If there is no emerging New World Order, what is "global governance" all about?
"Who are the movers and shakers promoting global government?" you ask. Obviously, it is the international bankers who are the heavyweights behind the push for global government. Remember, one cannot create a "global economy" without a global government to manage, oversee, and control it.
In a letter written to Colonel E. Mandell House, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."
"Old Hickory" did his best to rid the United States from the death grip that the international bankers were beginning to exert on this country. He may have been the last President to actually oppose the bankers. In discussing the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, Jackson said, "Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out."
Unfortunately, the international bankers proved themselves to be too formidable for President Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration of President Woodrow Wilson, the bankers were given charge over America’s financial system by the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Ever since the CFR and Trilateral Commission were created, they have filled the key leadership positions of government, big media, and of course, the Federal Reserve.
In his book, "With No Apologies," former Republican Presidential nominee Barry Goldwater wrote, "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power-- political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future." Was Goldwater a prophet or what?
And again, the goals of the global elite have been publicly stated. Back in 1991, the founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major media for their complicity in helping to facilitate the globalist agenda by saying, "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
How could Rockefeller be any plainer? He acknowledged the willful assistance of the major media in helping to keep the elitists’ agenda of global government from the American people. To this day, the major media has not deviated from that collaboration. And this includes the aforementioned "conservative" talking heads. They know if they want to keep their jobs, they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO, more than anything else, is the "Third Rail" to the national media.
Is it any wonder that President Barack Obama has stacked his government with numerous members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet Napolitano, Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle. Other CFR members include CFR President Richard Haass, CFR Director Richard Holbrooke, and founding member of the Trilateral Commission and CFR member Paul Volcker. Obama even asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to deliver the inaugural prayer.
Still not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what he thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, "I think his task will be develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It’s a great opportunity; it isn’t just a crisis."
This is the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991, "Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Even Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world government. In his column he said, "I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.
"A ’world government’ would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.
"So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might."
Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government is plausible.
Do you now see why it does not matter to a tinker’s dam whether it is a Republican or Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? For the most part, both major parties in Washington, D.C., have been under the dominating influence of the international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also why it does not matter whether one calls himself conservative or liberal. For the most part, both conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., are facilitating the emerging New World Order. It is time we wake up to this reality.
Presidents Bush, Sr., Bill Clinton, and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the table for the implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in the east. All Obama has to do is put the food on the table--and you can count on this: Barack Obama will serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot believe!
That a New World Order is emerging is not in question. The only question is, What will freedom-loving Americans do about it? Of course, the first thing they have to do is admit that an emerging New World Order exists! Until conservatives, Christians, pastors, constitutionalists, and others who care about a sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the reality of an emerging New World Order, they will be incapable of opposing it. And right now, that is exactly what they are not doing.
by Chuck Baldwin Constitution Party 2008 Presidential Candidate
It is hard to believe, but a majority of Americans (including Christians and conservatives) seem oblivious to the fact that there is a very real, very legitimate New World Order (NWO) unfolding. In the face of overwhelming evidence, most Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality, they seem unwilling to even remotely entertain the notion.
On one hand, it is understandable that so many Americans would be ignorant of the emerging New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses to report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even "conservative" commentators and talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, or Joe Scarborough refuse to discuss it. And when listeners call these respective programs, these "conservative" hosts usually resort to insulting the caller as being some kind of "conspiracy kook." One host even railed that if anyone questions the government line on 9/11, we should "lock them up and throw away the key." So much for freedom of speech!
This is an area--perhaps the central area--where liberals and conservatives agree: they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who believes that global government (in any form) is evolving. One has to wonder how otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people can be so brain dead when it comes to this issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling their strings, doesn’t it?
The list of notable personalities who have openly referenced or called for some kind of global government or New World Order is extremely lengthy. Are all these people "kooks" or "conspiracy nuts"? Why would world leaders--including presidents, secretaries of state, and high government officials; including the media, financial, and political elite--constantly refer to something that doesn’t exist? Why would they write about, talk about, or openly promote a New World Order, if there is no such thing?
Many of us recall President George Herbert Walker Bush talking much about an emerging New World Order. For example, in 1989, Bush told the students of Texas A&M University, "Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations."
Later, Bush, Sr. said, "We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order . . .. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders."
Bush, Sr. also said, "What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea--a new world order."
Bush, Sr. further said, "The world can therefore seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order . . ."
What was President G.H.W. Bush talking about, if there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he hallucinating?
England’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said, "We are all internationalists now, whether we like it or not." He continued saying, "On the eve of a new Millennium we are now in a new world. We need new rules for international co-operation and new ways of organizing our international institutions." He also said, "Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community."
In 1999, Tony Blair said, "Globalization has transformed our economies and our working practices. But globalism is not just economic. It is also a political and security phenomenon."
What is Tony Blair talking about, if there is no emerging New World Order? What does he mean by "a new doctrine of international community"? What does he mean by "new world"? How can one have globalism, which includes "a political and security phenomenon," without creating a New World Order? Is Tony Blair hallucinating?
Likewise, former President George W. Bush penned his signature to the Declaration of Quebec back on April 22, 2001, in which he gave a "commitment to hemispheric integration and national and collective responsibility for improving the economic well-being and security of our people."
By "our people," Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the people of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly reminded us that G.W. Bush "pledged that the United States will ’build a hemispheric family on the basis of a more just and democratic international order.’"
Remember, too, that it was G.W. Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United States to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is nothing more than a precursor to the North American Community or Union, as outlined in CFR member Robert Pastor’s manual, "Toward a North American Community."
If there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order, what was G.W. Bush talking about when he referred to "a hemispheric family" and an "international order"?
The public statements of notable world leaders regarding an emerging New World Order are copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman, Walter Cronkite.
In his book, "A Reporter’s Life," Walter Cronkite said, "A system of world order--preferably a system of world government--is mandatory. The proud nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and their own survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . ." Cronkite told BBC newsman Tim Sebastian, "I think we are realizing that we are going to have to have an international rule of law." He added, "We need not only an executive to make international law, but we need the military forces to enforce that law." Cronkite also said, "American people are going to begin to realize that perhaps they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an international body to enforce world law."
If there is no emerging New World Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking about? Can there be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global government? Absolutely not!
Now, when Bush, Sr. talks about fulfilling "the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders," he was talking about the same thing former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he said, "The time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed."
The United Nations has been on the forefront of promoting the New World Order agenda since its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual entitled, "Our Global Neighborhood." It states, "Population, consumption, technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management calls for a systematic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development, which has been the central lesson from the mounting ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global governance."
If there is no emerging New World Order, what is "global governance" all about?
"Who are the movers and shakers promoting global government?" you ask. Obviously, it is the international bankers who are the heavyweights behind the push for global government. Remember, one cannot create a "global economy" without a global government to manage, oversee, and control it.
In a letter written to Colonel E. Mandell House, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."
"Old Hickory" did his best to rid the United States from the death grip that the international bankers were beginning to exert on this country. He may have been the last President to actually oppose the bankers. In discussing the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, Jackson said, "Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out."
Unfortunately, the international bankers proved themselves to be too formidable for President Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration of President Woodrow Wilson, the bankers were given charge over America’s financial system by the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Ever since the CFR and Trilateral Commission were created, they have filled the key leadership positions of government, big media, and of course, the Federal Reserve.
In his book, "With No Apologies," former Republican Presidential nominee Barry Goldwater wrote, "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power-- political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future." Was Goldwater a prophet or what?
And again, the goals of the global elite have been publicly stated. Back in 1991, the founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major media for their complicity in helping to facilitate the globalist agenda by saying, "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
How could Rockefeller be any plainer? He acknowledged the willful assistance of the major media in helping to keep the elitists’ agenda of global government from the American people. To this day, the major media has not deviated from that collaboration. And this includes the aforementioned "conservative" talking heads. They know if they want to keep their jobs, they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO, more than anything else, is the "Third Rail" to the national media.
Is it any wonder that President Barack Obama has stacked his government with numerous members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet Napolitano, Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle. Other CFR members include CFR President Richard Haass, CFR Director Richard Holbrooke, and founding member of the Trilateral Commission and CFR member Paul Volcker. Obama even asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to deliver the inaugural prayer.
Still not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what he thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, "I think his task will be develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It’s a great opportunity; it isn’t just a crisis."
This is the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991, "Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Even Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world government. In his column he said, "I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.
"A ’world government’ would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.
"So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might."
Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government is plausible.
Do you now see why it does not matter to a tinker’s dam whether it is a Republican or Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? For the most part, both major parties in Washington, D.C., have been under the dominating influence of the international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also why it does not matter whether one calls himself conservative or liberal. For the most part, both conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., are facilitating the emerging New World Order. It is time we wake up to this reality.
Presidents Bush, Sr., Bill Clinton, and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the table for the implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in the east. All Obama has to do is put the food on the table--and you can count on this: Barack Obama will serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot believe!
That a New World Order is emerging is not in question. The only question is, What will freedom-loving Americans do about it? Of course, the first thing they have to do is admit that an emerging New World Order exists! Until conservatives, Christians, pastors, constitutionalists, and others who care about a sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the reality of an emerging New World Order, they will be incapable of opposing it. And right now, that is exactly what they are not doing.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Socialism 101
Well, Obamessiah hasn't wasted anytime declaring war on unborn children and our security. He wants to close Guantanamo, he has release federal funding for abortions, you can bet we will soon be making babies in labs to kill for stem cell research. What a guy! The Vatican is furious about the abortion funding and has issued a strong statement. The Pope should probably get a food taster like the Popes of old if he is going to take on the world's savior. I would be willing to bet we have a new Pope within the next few years, a more liberal, Obama friendly false prophet kind of Pope.
On the security front, an article on Fox News .com is reporting Russia has suspended missile deployment in Europe because the chosen one has said he is rethinking placing a missile shield in Eastern Europe. I mean why should we help protect our allies in Nato against a guy ( Putin ) who thinks it is the cold war all over again. Bullies and despots cannot be appeased. They have to know if they make a wrong move it means there are consequences. During the cold war it was the unspoken mutual destruction policy that kept the Soviets at bay. Now that we have a socialist president and a population that has been completely taken in by him I can see us getting cozier and cozier with the likes of Putin and others of his ilk. This does not bode well for Americans who still value freedom. Keep your eyes open, communicate with your representatives, letting them know where you stand. Encourage other Patriots to do the same. We have to save America. And exercise your second amendment rights. The first thing dictators do to cement control is to disarm the citizenry. Be watchful, be vigilant. Be a Patriot.
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."- Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto
Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it. The history of liberty is a history of resistance." ~Woodrow Wilson
On the security front, an article on Fox News .com is reporting Russia has suspended missile deployment in Europe because the chosen one has said he is rethinking placing a missile shield in Eastern Europe. I mean why should we help protect our allies in Nato against a guy ( Putin ) who thinks it is the cold war all over again. Bullies and despots cannot be appeased. They have to know if they make a wrong move it means there are consequences. During the cold war it was the unspoken mutual destruction policy that kept the Soviets at bay. Now that we have a socialist president and a population that has been completely taken in by him I can see us getting cozier and cozier with the likes of Putin and others of his ilk. This does not bode well for Americans who still value freedom. Keep your eyes open, communicate with your representatives, letting them know where you stand. Encourage other Patriots to do the same. We have to save America. And exercise your second amendment rights. The first thing dictators do to cement control is to disarm the citizenry. Be watchful, be vigilant. Be a Patriot.
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."- Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto
Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it. The history of liberty is a history of resistance." ~Woodrow Wilson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)